Go to this website, amazing
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/POLITICS/FOSTER_COVERUP/foster.html
31 July, 2005
27 July, 2005
26 July, 2005
25 July, 2005
National Team Wins Gold Cup
Congrats to the US National Team for winning the CONCACAF Gold Cup v. Panama!
Another Moron
"Are two people supposed to be with each other for the rest of thier lives? I don't believe that is realisitic. That's my opinion." Kate Hudson on marriage, from US magazine
I'm not posting this because I'm Catholic, married, and actually plan on spending the rest of my life with my wife, but because some people should really keep thier opinions to themselves. I was talking to another bartender the other day, and we were talking about opinions. My reply was "Everyone can have an opinion, doesn't mean its correct."
But really folks, statements like this reinforce the public's perception of Hollywood's lack of morals, commitment, and considerations of the rest of America. Because she is a celeb, she has authority? Of course that's why they can testify before Congress because of a role they portray. In that case, I'm waiting for Vin Disel to testify on behalf of nannies for his role in "The Pacifier."
By the way, she's married. There's a vote of confidence for her hubbie.
I'm not posting this because I'm Catholic, married, and actually plan on spending the rest of my life with my wife, but because some people should really keep thier opinions to themselves. I was talking to another bartender the other day, and we were talking about opinions. My reply was "Everyone can have an opinion, doesn't mean its correct."
But really folks, statements like this reinforce the public's perception of Hollywood's lack of morals, commitment, and considerations of the rest of America. Because she is a celeb, she has authority? Of course that's why they can testify before Congress because of a role they portray. In that case, I'm waiting for Vin Disel to testify on behalf of nannies for his role in "The Pacifier."
By the way, she's married. There's a vote of confidence for her hubbie.
22 July, 2005
Ahh ... Memories
From my fraternity's 1988 Bike-a-thon T-Shirt:
Phi Sigma Kappa @ Ball State
Top Ten Reasons We Are Not Paired With A Sorority
10. We're our own best friends
9. Our house is green
8. We don't put out
7. We don't abuse enough women
6. Troy
5. We can't afford enough food
4. Its got to be better than last year
3. Our mommies and daddies don't buy us new cars
2. We won Grrek Week, we don't need to party with anyone else
1. Greeks, freaks, sluts, motorheads, jocks ... they all say we're righteous dudes
Phi Sigma Kappa @ Ball State
Top Ten Reasons We Are Not Paired With A Sorority
10. We're our own best friends
9. Our house is green
8. We don't put out
7. We don't abuse enough women
6. Troy
5. We can't afford enough food
4. Its got to be better than last year
3. Our mommies and daddies don't buy us new cars
2. We won Grrek Week, we don't need to party with anyone else
1. Greeks, freaks, sluts, motorheads, jocks ... they all say we're righteous dudes
21 July, 2005
15 July, 2005
Hitch Hits It
"Why did Saddam Hussein, that great lion of the Arab and Muslim world, denounce the American bombing of the Muslim-killing Milosevic? Why did Qaddafi do the same? For the very same reason that Christian fascists in Serbia now denounce the intervention in Iraq: They know that the main foe is the United States and that this fact transcends all the others. There has been a great deal of nonsense published in the last week to the effect that an alliance with the United States can put other countries like Britain in the position of being "targeted." Why deny this? I reflect on what was not done at Srebrenica, and on what ought to have been done in Rwanda, and on what was put off too long with the Taliban and the Baathists, and I think what an honor it is to have such enemies. Co-existence with them is not possible, which is good, because it is not desirable or tolerable, either. The Srebrenica memorial stands as enduring testimony to that inescapable conclusion."
Hitch
http://www.slate.com/id/2122395/
Hitch
http://www.slate.com/id/2122395/
14 July, 2005
Get'm
I went to the ConWebWacth website, to see how the otherside lives, and I was reminded how much Chris Matthews dislikes the Clintons. Then the website brillantly showed how much the liberals will turn on thier own to fit thier agenda.
Matthews is an old-school East Coast Democrat. I may disagree with him, but he tells it like it is, and appears honest. Frankly, I think he is disappointed and disinfranchised with the Dems. But his referring to Hillary as "witchy" and her not being "smart" was dead on.
So what does the left do, attack him. This guy is a lib, served as a chief member of Tip O'Neal's staff, and unafraid to call out a minister at his church on his support of the war. He asked the minister, with respect (take note media) if he would have supported the war if Clinton was in charge. The minster's response, if it was done right.
Watch Hardball, it'll make you smart.
Galloway is a punk
"Today in Great Britain, George Galloway sits in the Parliament, a former member of the Labor Party, who broke away, joining the RESPECT party which ran in the last election. Its major message is to blame Tony Blair for supporting and joining forces with the U.S. in Iraq. Galloway criticized Blair after 7/7 saying, “Tragically, Londoners have now paid the price of the government ignoring such warnings.” Galloway represents the vision of the Brits who supported Neville Chamberlain in 1939. Blair, on the other hand, represents the vision of Winston Churchill. " - Ed Koch, fmr. Mayor of NYC
13 July, 2005
McCain in 2008
With the discovery of Sen. McCain in "The Wedding Crashers," I hearby will support him in his run for President. Heck, Jeb's gonna be a VP. I have saying I try to live by, "If you can't laugh at yourself, don't get outta bed, we don't want you!"
Get'm Iron Mike
Got your back Coach
Ditka tackles ban on smoking
Proposal's foes bring in Da Coach
http://chicagosports.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/chi-0507130027jul13,1,5362423.story?coll=cs-bears-headlines&ctrack=1&cset=true
11 July, 2005
Players who will either explode or solidify thier rank
Bills: Willis McGahee RB - healthy and now the feature backver
Fins: Vernon Carey OG- will benfit with new system and stronger willed coach to push him
Pats: Vince Wilfork NT- yes I know another Cane, but he will continue as a strong force int eh middle
Jets: Laveranues Coles WR - reunited with Pennington will rack up numbers and wins
Ravens: Ed Reed S- will prove to be the best DB in the league for years to come
Bengals: Carson Palmer QB- he will finally begin to put it together, even with the Bungles
Browns: Charlie Frye QB- won't get much playing time till the middle of the season, but will prove to the a second round steal and franchise QB
Steelers: Larry Foote MLB - steps up and stands out for the shadow of Bell
Texans: David Carr QB & Andre Johnson WR- could Morency be the third piece to the puzzle to create another fierce trio in Texas?
Colts: the Edge RB - two words "contract year" two more "franchise tag"
Jags: Greg Jones FB - if they don't trade for Henry, he will be the man to put it in the endzone or shortyardage
Titans: Ben Troupe TE- with a depleted recieving core, McNair will need a solid target
Broncos: Tatum Bell RB- with all that chop blocking ... err cut blocking ... he will be another system back
Chiefs: Kendrell Bell LB - seeing thier D still needs work, he will stand out as he should
Raiders: Robert Gallery OT- the el ed teacher will prove to be a future hall of famer
Chargers: Drew Brees QB- another year of Rivers holding the clipboard
Cowboys: Julius Jones RB- healthy and ready to prove not picking Jackson
Giants: Justin Tuck DE- will come from nowhere with the contined marking of Strahan
Eagles: Shane Andrews OG- paves the way for Westbrook
Skins: Marcus Washington OLB- one of the most underrated and solid LB in the league. Yes he went to the Pro Bowl, but that's the tip
Lions: Kevin Jones RB- with the three strong young WRs, he will run rampant, plus he is very talented
Pack: Ahmad Carrol DB- with a weak secondary, they need something
Vikings: Bryant McKinne OT- will bring back memories of another great OT, Stringer, RIP my man
Falcons: DeAngelo Hall DB- he now knows how fast the game is
Panthers: Thomas Davis DB or OLB- where ever they put him, it will make a difference
Saints: Courteny Watson MLB- another second year benefitter
Bucs: Mark Clayton WR- Chuckie's system will hit full stride
Cardinals: Larry Fitzgerald WR- he was pleasure to watch in college, and will be more in the pros
Rams: Stephen Jackson RB- will win the rushing title
Niners: Frank Gore RB- I don't knwo why, I just got a wierd feeling
Seahawks: Michael Boulware S- he won't be a place to throw the ball if you don't reciever leaving on a stretcher
And finally, Da Bears: Charles Tillman CB- will prove to be a fearless coverman, solid tackler and Pro Bowler. He was one of the only corners to negate Moss.
Fins: Vernon Carey OG- will benfit with new system and stronger willed coach to push him
Pats: Vince Wilfork NT- yes I know another Cane, but he will continue as a strong force int eh middle
Jets: Laveranues Coles WR - reunited with Pennington will rack up numbers and wins
Ravens: Ed Reed S- will prove to be the best DB in the league for years to come
Bengals: Carson Palmer QB- he will finally begin to put it together, even with the Bungles
Browns: Charlie Frye QB- won't get much playing time till the middle of the season, but will prove to the a second round steal and franchise QB
Steelers: Larry Foote MLB - steps up and stands out for the shadow of Bell
Texans: David Carr QB & Andre Johnson WR- could Morency be the third piece to the puzzle to create another fierce trio in Texas?
Colts: the Edge RB - two words "contract year" two more "franchise tag"
Jags: Greg Jones FB - if they don't trade for Henry, he will be the man to put it in the endzone or shortyardage
Titans: Ben Troupe TE- with a depleted recieving core, McNair will need a solid target
Broncos: Tatum Bell RB- with all that chop blocking ... err cut blocking ... he will be another system back
Chiefs: Kendrell Bell LB - seeing thier D still needs work, he will stand out as he should
Raiders: Robert Gallery OT- the el ed teacher will prove to be a future hall of famer
Chargers: Drew Brees QB- another year of Rivers holding the clipboard
Cowboys: Julius Jones RB- healthy and ready to prove not picking Jackson
Giants: Justin Tuck DE- will come from nowhere with the contined marking of Strahan
Eagles: Shane Andrews OG- paves the way for Westbrook
Skins: Marcus Washington OLB- one of the most underrated and solid LB in the league. Yes he went to the Pro Bowl, but that's the tip
Lions: Kevin Jones RB- with the three strong young WRs, he will run rampant, plus he is very talented
Pack: Ahmad Carrol DB- with a weak secondary, they need something
Vikings: Bryant McKinne OT- will bring back memories of another great OT, Stringer, RIP my man
Falcons: DeAngelo Hall DB- he now knows how fast the game is
Panthers: Thomas Davis DB or OLB- where ever they put him, it will make a difference
Saints: Courteny Watson MLB- another second year benefitter
Bucs: Mark Clayton WR- Chuckie's system will hit full stride
Cardinals: Larry Fitzgerald WR- he was pleasure to watch in college, and will be more in the pros
Rams: Stephen Jackson RB- will win the rushing title
Niners: Frank Gore RB- I don't knwo why, I just got a wierd feeling
Seahawks: Michael Boulware S- he won't be a place to throw the ball if you don't reciever leaving on a stretcher
And finally, Da Bears: Charles Tillman CB- will prove to be a fearless coverman, solid tackler and Pro Bowler. He was one of the only corners to negate Moss.
I gotta thank the kid at for this http://thepoliticalteen.net/2005/07/09/1910/ piece, just a brillant pick up. With the London bombing, I could only imagine the anger soothing out of Hitch among others. He will be a fun one to read and watch the next few weeks.
http://www.radioblogger.com/#000816 below
On MSNBC's Connected: Coast to Coast, Christopher Hitchens from Vanity Fair was involved in a complete verbal undressing of Ron Reagan. Reagan, like all the other feel first, hate Bush second, think last lefties, is so intent on re-writing history to make the case that the war in Iraq was illegitimate, got boxed around the ears by Hitchens. Here's the exchange:
RR: Christopher, I'm not sure that I buy the idea that these attacks are a sign that we're actually winning the war on terror. I mean, how many more victories like this do we really want to endure?
CH: Well, it depends on how you think it started, sir. I mean, these movements had taken over Afghanistan, had very nearly taken over Algeria, in a extremely bloody war which actually was eventually won by Algerian society. They had sent death squads to try and kill my friend Salman Rushdie, for the offense of writing a novel in England. They had sent death squads to Austria and Germany, the Iranians had, for example, to try and kill Kurdish Muslim leaders there. If you make the mistake that I thought I heard you making just before we came on the air, of attributing rationality or a motive to this, and to say that it's about anything but itself, you make a great mistake, and you end up where you ended up, saying that the cause of terrorism is fighting against it, the root cause, I mean. Now, you even said, extraordinarily to me, that there was no terrorist problem in Iraq before 2003. Do you know nothing about the subject at all? Do you wonder how Mr. Zarqawi got there under the rule of Saddam Hussein? Have you ever heard of Abu Nidal?
RR: Well, I'm following the lead of the 9/11 Commission, which...
CH: Have you ever heard of Abu Nidal, the most wanted man in the world, who was sheltered in Baghdad? The man who pushed Leon Klinghoffer off the boat, was sheltered by Saddam Hussein. The man who blew up the World Trade Center in 1993 was sheltered by Saddam Hussein, and you have the nerve to say that terrorism is caused by resisting it? And by deposing governments that endorse it?
RR: No, actually, I didn't say that, Christopher.
CH: At this stage, after what happened in London yesterday?
RR: What I did say, though, was that Iraq was not a center of terrorism before we went in there, but it might be now.
CH: How can you know so little about...
RR: You can make the claim that you just made about any other country in the Middle East, including Saudi Arabia.
CH: Absolutely nonsense.
RR: So do you think we ought to invade Saudi Arabia, where most of the hijackers from 9/11 came from, following your logic, Christopher?
CH: Uh, no. Excuse me. The hijackers may have been Saudi and Yemeni, but they were not envoys of the Saudi Arabian government, even when you said the worst...
RR: Zarqawi is not an envoy of Saddam Hussein, either.
CH: Excuse me. When I went to interview Abu Nidal, then the most wanted terrorist in the world, in Baghdad, he was operating out of an Iraqi government office. He was an arm of the Iraqi State, while being the most wanted man in the world. The same is true of the shelter and safe house offered by the Iraqi government, to the murderers of Leon Klinghoffer, and to Mr. Yassin, who mixed the chemicals for the World Trade Center bombing in 1993. How can you know so little about this, and be occupying a chair at the time that you do?
RR: I guess because I listen to the 9/11 Commission, and read their report, and they said that Saddam Hussein was not exporting terror. I suppose that's how, Christopher.
CH: Well, then they were wrong, weren't they?
RR: No, maybe they just needed to listen to you, Christopher.
CH; Well, I'm not sure that they actually did say that. What they did say was they didn't know of any actual operational connection...
RR: That's right. No substantive operational connection.
CH: ...which was the Iraqi Baath Party and...excuse me...and Al Qaeda. A direct operational connection. Now, that's because they don't know. They don't say there isn't one. They say they couldn't find one. But I just gave you the number, I would have thought, rather suggestive examples.
http://www.radioblogger.com/#000816 below
On MSNBC's Connected: Coast to Coast, Christopher Hitchens from Vanity Fair was involved in a complete verbal undressing of Ron Reagan. Reagan, like all the other feel first, hate Bush second, think last lefties, is so intent on re-writing history to make the case that the war in Iraq was illegitimate, got boxed around the ears by Hitchens. Here's the exchange:
RR: Christopher, I'm not sure that I buy the idea that these attacks are a sign that we're actually winning the war on terror. I mean, how many more victories like this do we really want to endure?
CH: Well, it depends on how you think it started, sir. I mean, these movements had taken over Afghanistan, had very nearly taken over Algeria, in a extremely bloody war which actually was eventually won by Algerian society. They had sent death squads to try and kill my friend Salman Rushdie, for the offense of writing a novel in England. They had sent death squads to Austria and Germany, the Iranians had, for example, to try and kill Kurdish Muslim leaders there. If you make the mistake that I thought I heard you making just before we came on the air, of attributing rationality or a motive to this, and to say that it's about anything but itself, you make a great mistake, and you end up where you ended up, saying that the cause of terrorism is fighting against it, the root cause, I mean. Now, you even said, extraordinarily to me, that there was no terrorist problem in Iraq before 2003. Do you know nothing about the subject at all? Do you wonder how Mr. Zarqawi got there under the rule of Saddam Hussein? Have you ever heard of Abu Nidal?
RR: Well, I'm following the lead of the 9/11 Commission, which...
CH: Have you ever heard of Abu Nidal, the most wanted man in the world, who was sheltered in Baghdad? The man who pushed Leon Klinghoffer off the boat, was sheltered by Saddam Hussein. The man who blew up the World Trade Center in 1993 was sheltered by Saddam Hussein, and you have the nerve to say that terrorism is caused by resisting it? And by deposing governments that endorse it?
RR: No, actually, I didn't say that, Christopher.
CH: At this stage, after what happened in London yesterday?
RR: What I did say, though, was that Iraq was not a center of terrorism before we went in there, but it might be now.
CH: How can you know so little about...
RR: You can make the claim that you just made about any other country in the Middle East, including Saudi Arabia.
CH: Absolutely nonsense.
RR: So do you think we ought to invade Saudi Arabia, where most of the hijackers from 9/11 came from, following your logic, Christopher?
CH: Uh, no. Excuse me. The hijackers may have been Saudi and Yemeni, but they were not envoys of the Saudi Arabian government, even when you said the worst...
RR: Zarqawi is not an envoy of Saddam Hussein, either.
CH: Excuse me. When I went to interview Abu Nidal, then the most wanted terrorist in the world, in Baghdad, he was operating out of an Iraqi government office. He was an arm of the Iraqi State, while being the most wanted man in the world. The same is true of the shelter and safe house offered by the Iraqi government, to the murderers of Leon Klinghoffer, and to Mr. Yassin, who mixed the chemicals for the World Trade Center bombing in 1993. How can you know so little about this, and be occupying a chair at the time that you do?
RR: I guess because I listen to the 9/11 Commission, and read their report, and they said that Saddam Hussein was not exporting terror. I suppose that's how, Christopher.
CH: Well, then they were wrong, weren't they?
RR: No, maybe they just needed to listen to you, Christopher.
CH; Well, I'm not sure that they actually did say that. What they did say was they didn't know of any actual operational connection...
RR: That's right. No substantive operational connection.
CH: ...which was the Iraqi Baath Party and...excuse me...and Al Qaeda. A direct operational connection. Now, that's because they don't know. They don't say there isn't one. They say they couldn't find one. But I just gave you the number, I would have thought, rather suggestive examples.
07 July, 2005
This sums it up, thanks drudge
The Brits have been here before, it is time for the bad guys to sweat.
06 July, 2005
Che was full of toro caca
Read the article and look for more info on your own
The Killing Machineby Alvaro Vargas Llosa
The New Republic
http://www.tnr.com/doc.mhtml?i=20050711&s=vargasllosa071105&pt=0YHNocVOEr3Q%2F3fDaehtod%3D%3D
"Which brings us back to Carlos Santana and his chic Che gear. In an open letter published in El Nuevo Herald on March 31 of this year, the great jazz musician Paquito D'Rivera castigated Santana for his costume at the Oscars, and added: "One of those Cubans [at La Cabaña] was my cousin Bebo, who was imprisoned there precisely for being a Christian. He recounts to me with infinite bitterness how he could hear from his cell in the early hours of dawn the executions, without trial or process of law, of the many who died shouting, 'Long live Christ the King!'"
The Killing Machineby Alvaro Vargas Llosa
The New Republic
http://www.tnr.com/doc.mhtml?i=20050711&s=vargasllosa071105&pt=0YHNocVOEr3Q%2F3fDaehtod%3D%3D
"Which brings us back to Carlos Santana and his chic Che gear. In an open letter published in El Nuevo Herald on March 31 of this year, the great jazz musician Paquito D'Rivera castigated Santana for his costume at the Oscars, and added: "One of those Cubans [at La Cabaña] was my cousin Bebo, who was imprisoned there precisely for being a Christian. He recounts to me with infinite bitterness how he could hear from his cell in the early hours of dawn the executions, without trial or process of law, of the many who died shouting, 'Long live Christ the King!'"
05 July, 2005
from 85
"The funniest thing happened when the Oakland Raiders came to town and we beat up on them physically and mentally and every other way, and they left and said we were the dirtiest team they'd ever seen. That was a great one."
Buddy Ryan
Buddy Ryan
Can't Wait to See Biden's Remarks Come Back to Bite Him
"Just as Justice O'Connor deserves a happy and full retirement, the nation deserves an independent and impartial nominee, one who will not force a divisive battle over the Supreme Court. That will in large part depend on President Bush's decision on whom to nominate to succeed Justice O'Connor."
Picking a Nominee Who Unites - Sen. Joseph Biden, San Diego Union-Tribune
In otherwords, someone who we can have pushed around. After the immature bickering of the 2000 & 2004 election, do you really think the democrats have the emotional capability to find a Court member who would make them happy? They will make the Bork hearings resemble a "Norm" greeting in Cheers.
Picking a Nominee Who Unites - Sen. Joseph Biden, San Diego Union-Tribune
In otherwords, someone who we can have pushed around. After the immature bickering of the 2000 & 2004 election, do you really think the democrats have the emotional capability to find a Court member who would make them happy? They will make the Bork hearings resemble a "Norm" greeting in Cheers.
04 July, 2005
Thoughts of a Teacher
"I don't know what effect these men will have upon the enemy, but, by God, they terrify me."
- George Washington
Thanks to George Will for this one
- George Washington
Thanks to George Will for this one
02 July, 2005
Liberal Silence
Headlines for July 1, 2005 from www.democracynow.org
- Iraq Gov't: 8,200 Iraqis Killed Over Past Six Months
Try murdered, borderline a hate crime, by Islamic Jihadist terrorists trying to establish thier own version of a theocracy by use of carbombs and asassinations. It is utterally amazing how the left can silently sit and watch these civilians and brave soldiers/police officers be killed to support thier agenda aganist this war. If these were white people, it would be an outrage, but the subtle racist beliefs of intellectual and moral superioroty of the left allows these brave Iraqis to die. And don't think people arn't paying attention to them keeping Third World countires from developing better forms of food production, yes using chemicals, to feed millions. But becasue their own agenda, they pressure countries not to follow though with ideas and development to feed and save millions.
Pathetic
- Iraq Gov't: 8,200 Iraqis Killed Over Past Six Months
Try murdered, borderline a hate crime, by Islamic Jihadist terrorists trying to establish thier own version of a theocracy by use of carbombs and asassinations. It is utterally amazing how the left can silently sit and watch these civilians and brave soldiers/police officers be killed to support thier agenda aganist this war. If these were white people, it would be an outrage, but the subtle racist beliefs of intellectual and moral superioroty of the left allows these brave Iraqis to die. And don't think people arn't paying attention to them keeping Third World countires from developing better forms of food production, yes using chemicals, to feed millions. But becasue their own agenda, they pressure countries not to follow though with ideas and development to feed and save millions.
Pathetic
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
