
What does one pine for what the other has not explained for its wherabouts?

A Clue

My original blog after it has been cleaned up a bit. Not that this groundbreaking work, but I found some old posts, photos and clips that I may reuse.
Ted Turner: "I am absolutely convinced that the North Koreans are absolutely sincere. There’s really no reason for them to cheat [on nukes]....I looked them right in the eyes. And they looked like they meant the truth. You know, just because somebody’s done something wrong in the past doesn’t mean they can’t do right in the future or the present. That happens all the, all the time."
Wolf Blitzer: "But this is one of the most despotic regimes and Kim Jong-Il is one of the worst men on Earth. Isn’t that a fair assessment?"
Turner: "Well, I didn’t get to meet him, but he didn’t look — in the pictures that I’ve seen of him on CNN, he didn’t look too much different than most other people."
Blitzer: "But, look at the way, look at the way he’s, look at the way he’s treating his own people."
Turner: "Well, hey, listen. I saw a lot of people over there. They were thin and they were riding bicycles instead of driving in cars, but–"
Blitzer: "A lot of those people are starving."
Turner: "I didn’t see any, I didn’t see any brutality...."
— Exchange on CNN’s The Situation Room, Sept. 19.
CLINTON ADMINISTRATION SECRET SEARCH ON AMERICANS -- WITHOUT COURT ORDERCARTER EXECUTIVE ORDER: 'ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE' WITHOUT COURT ORDER Bill Clinton Signed Executive Order that allowed Attorney General to do searches without court approvalClinton, February 9, 1995: "The Attorney General is authorized to approve physical searches, without a court order"Jimmy Carter Signed Executive Order on May 23, 1979: "Attorney General is authorized to approve electronic surveillance to acquire foreign intelligence information without a court order." WASH POST, July 15, 1994: Extend not only to searches of the homes of U.S. citizens but also -- in the delicate words of a Justice Department official -- to "places where you wouldn't find or would be unlikely to find information involving a U.S. citizen... would allow the government to use classified electronic surveillance techniques, such as infrared sensors to observe people inside their homes, without a court order."Deputy Attorney General Jamie S. Gorelick, the Clinton administration believes the president "has inherent authority to conduct warrantless searches for foreign intelligence purposes."Secret searches and wiretaps of Aldrich Ames's office and home in June and October 1993, both without a federal warrant.END
In her testimony, Gorelick made clear that the president believed he had the power to order warrantless searches for the purpose of gathering intelligence, even if there was no reason to believe that the search might uncover evidence of a crime. "Intelligence is often long range, its exact targets are more difficult to identify, and its focus is less precise," Gorelick said. "Information gathering for policy making and prevention, rather than prosecution, are its primary focus."
I also want to speak to those of you who did not support my decision to send troops to Iraq: I have heard your disagreement, and I know how deeply it is felt. Yet now there are only two options before our country — victory or defeat. And the need for victory is larger than any president or political party, because the security of our people is in the balance. I do not expect you to support everything I do, but tonight I have a request: Do not give in to despair, and do not give up on this fight for freedom.
The former president omitted to mention that many American economists advised US leader to not sign a global warming agreement that either hurt the US economically or that exempted developing nations – like China, India and Brazil, the fastest growing sources of greenhouse gas emissions – from emission cuts. As President Bush noted when he rejected the treaty early in his administration, Kyoto violated both of these provisions and thus would not garner Senate ratification and did not merit his support. Senator John Kerry who ran against Bush in 2004 cited the same reasons for rejecting Kyoto.
While Clinton indulged in his usual rhetorical denigration of Bush and his policies, he neglected to mention the fact that Russia's president also opposed Kyoto.
"The Kyoto protocol places significant limitations on the economic growth of Russia," said Andrei Illarionov, who advises President Vladimir Putin on economic issues. "Of course, in its current form, this protocol cannot be ratified,"
Clinton also failed to tell his audience of UN delegates and internationalists that his own Democrat Party opposed Kyoto when the Dems joined the GOP Senators and voted against the protocol by a resounding 95-0. The US Senate told Clinton, "[We} could not support any global warming pact that did not bind developing countries along with developed countries."
No US Senate will ever implement a protocol that so unfairly forces the US to reduce production and energy consumption while allowing polluters like Brazil, India, and particularly China to carry on relatively unaffected.
Not surprising is the fact that some US Senators understood Clinton was acting more out of self-interest than out of concern for the environment and so felt little guilt in opposing the Clinton Administration on Kyoto.
According to the November 1992 edition of the Enron corporate newsletter, "To The Point," the company looked forward to dealing with the incoming Clinton administration. The newsletter noted, "Senator [Al] Gore has been an avid proponent of a strong global warming policy that would lower greenhouse gas emissions."
And the Enron communiqué noted that Clinton and Gore's support of restrictions on carbon dioxide emissions "should provide a real opportunity for natural gas."
Enron stood to benefit from any government restrictions on greenhouse gas emissions because the company had ownership or financial stake in numerous natural gas and wind power technologies, which produce little or no greenhouse gas emissions.
While the Democrats have had success with linking President Bush to Enron, it was Clinton whom Enron had in its pocket. And Enron wanted Kyoto. In fact, Clinton's statement's on December 9, 2005 is a paraphrase of Enron executive Jeff Keeler's 2001 statement in the Amicus Journal, "You can do something meaningful on carbon without collapsing the economy or causing an energy crisis. We believed that before the Bush announcement [to not sign Kyoto]. We believe it now."
Even Clinton's friend British Prime Minister Tony Blair knew something was rotten in Denmark when Bill kept pushing Kyoto. Announcing that he would be "brutally honest" on the subject of the Kyoto Protocol and its future, Blair stated, "My thinking has changed in the past three or four years ... No country is going to cut its growth." Nations like China and India, picked to be this century's superpowers and notably not covered by the protocol, were "not going to start negotiating another treaty like Kyoto."
As with most of today's liberals, Bill Clinton cares more for the goals of internationalists and less about the goals of his own country. He also displays a clear penchant for building himself up by tearing others down, a sure sign of immaturity. Like so many of his ilk today, while in other countries, he has no shame in criticizing -- even lying about -- his own country. But then again, Bill Clinton never had shame about anything.
Like most independent counsels, Barrett didn't set out on such a mission. He was assigned the duty of looking into whether former Housing and Urban Development Secretary Henry Cisneros committed tax fraud in trying to cover up payments to a former mistress.
Yet, as published reports have indicated, he soon discovered that he was onto something much bigger. He found unsettling evidence that Justice Department officials were actively interfering with the probe and even conducting surveillance of Barrett and his office. Worse, there were indications that Team Clinton was using key players at the IRS and Justice to harass, frighten and threaten people who somehow got in the former president's way.
The pattern was set early on, when the White House sicced the FBI on Billy Dale, who had served as the director of the White House Travel Office since the days of John F. Kennedy. They mounted a baseless probe of Dale's finances, while chasing after his daughter, his sister and others. Dale was guilty of holding a job coveted by presidential pal Harry Thomasson. But rather than simply firing Dale, the Clinton White House chose to destroy him.
By all accounts, the 400-page Barrett report is a bombshell, capable possibly of wiping out Hillary Rodham Clinton's presidential prospects. At the very least, it would bring to public attention a scandal that would make the Valerie Plame affair vanish into comical insignificance.
Democrats know this. Using provisions in the independent-counsel statute that permit people named in a report to review the allegations against them and file rebuttals, attorneys close to the Clintons have spent the better part of five years reviewing every jot and tittle of the charges arrayed against their clients and friends.
Kerry on CBS Face the Nation- And there is no reason, Bob, that young American soldiers need to be
going into the homes of Iraqis in the dead of night, terrorizing kids and
children, you know, women, breaking sort of the customs of the of the historical
customs, religious customs.
I have this picture on my classroom door. When my students ask who she is, even the African Americans, I tell them who she is. They know what she did, but they also observe she doesn't look that menacing, little do they know the real power of civil disobedience.
Like George W. Bush, for one. 50 thinks the president is "incredible ... a
gangsta." "I wanna meet George Bush, just shake his hand and tell him how much
of me I see in him," 50 told GQ. If the rapper's felony conviction didn't
prevent him from voting, 50 said he would have voted for Bush.
BENNINGTON, Vt. -- A high school teacher is facing questions from administrators
after giving a vocabulary quiz that included digs at President Bush, Republicans
and the extreme right.
Bret Chenkin, a social studies and English teacher at
Mount Anthony Union High School, said he gave the quiz to his students several
months ago. The quiz asked students to pick the proper words to complete
sentences.
One example: "I wish Bush would be (coherent, eschewed) for
once during a speech, but there are theories that his everyday diction charms
the below-average mind, hence insuring him Republican votes." "Coherent" was
considered the right answer.
Principal Sue Maguire said she hoped to speak
to anyone who complained about the quiz and any students who might be concerned.
She said she also would talk with Chenkin. School Superintendent Wesley Knapp
said he takes the situation seriously.
"It's absolutely unacceptable," Knapp
said. "They (teachers) don't have a license to hold forth on a particular
standpoint."
Chenkin, 36, a teacher for seven years, said he isn't shy about
sharing his liberal views with students as a way of prompting debate, but he
said the quizzes are being taken out of context.
"The kids know it's
hyperbolic, so to speak," he said. "They know it's tongue-in-cheek." But he said
he would change his teaching methods if some are concerned.
"I'll put in
both sides," he said. "Especially if it's going to cause a lot of grief."
The school is in Bennington, a community of about 16,500 in the southwest
corner of the state.
"sharing his liberal views with students as a way of prompting debate."No, that is the cheapest, lamest cop-out like some student pinched for cheating, "Oh, I got called out on this one, so make up this song and dance." More or less he is a second rate teacher betraying the rest of the profession.
I am mindful that Samuel Johnson enjoined the preachers of his time not to
inveigh against those who were absent from church on Sundays by scolding those
who were not absent. Notwithstanding Dr. Johnson's stricture, I here berate
those who fail to heed the atrocities in China and North Korea, by appealing to
those who have heeded these barbarisms, drawing attention to the inattention
that the Christian world seems to be paying them. There is no means of putting
away from memory the experience of the Jews in the last century, objects of
discrimination of various and imaginative kinds, culminating in genocide.
Meghan Clyne of the New York Sun cites a report on North Korea compiled by
David Hawk, the author of "Hidden Gulag: Exposing North Korea's Prison Camps."
Hawk and his South Korean researchers obtained dozens of eyewitness accounts of
persecutions of Christians.
President Bush, in his speech in Japan last
week, didn't say that Christians in North Korea were in large numbers
imprisoned, but he spoke of "satellite maps of North Korea (that showed) prison
camps the size of whole cities."
Michael Cromartie, chairman of the U.S.
Commission on International Religious Freedom, which issued Hawk's report,
"called on Mr. Bush to include the specific findings of the North Korean report
in his diplomatic discussions with Chinese and South Korean officials ... and to
urge leaders of both Asian nations to take a firmer stand against their
communist neighbor." He is proud of the report, citing the difficulty in
bringing together reliable information from within that ideological mudhole.
The report tells, among many other accounts, of a woman in her 20s who was
washing clothes in a river. A fellow washerwoman saw a small Bible fall out of
her basket and reported her to the authorities. She was executed by firing
squad.
That martyr got off lightly. Nine years ago in South Pyongan
province, a unit of the North Korean army was assigned the job of widening a
highway connecting Pyongyang to the nearest seaport. Demolition of a house
standing in the way revealed, hidden between two bricks, a Bible and a list of
25 names: a Christian pastor, two assistant pastors, two elders and 20
parishioners. The 25 were all detained and, later that month, brought to the
road construction site, where spectators had been arranged in neat rows. The
parishioners were grouped off to one side while the pastor, the assistant
pastors and the elders were bound hand and foot and made to lie down in front of
a steamroller. As if following a script written in early Roman history, they
were told they could escape death by denying their faith and pledging to serve
Dear Leader Kim Jong II and Great Leader Kim Il Sung. They chose death.
Ms.
Clyne quotes Mr. Hawk's report: "Some of the parishioners ... cried, screamed
out, or fainted when the skulls made a popping sound as they were crushed
beneath the steamroller."
Anti-Christian activity is not as rabid in China,
but it is everywhere evident, and it has not been noticeably reduced by recent
rumors that the Vatican may withdraw the papal nuncio from Taipei and move him
to Beijing. The Vatican has so far persisted in recognizing the state of Taiwan,
which is something most other diplomatic entities shrink from doing. As everyone
knows, the determination by the Chinese to obtain sovereignty over Taiwan is of
a pitch comparable to the Vatican's devotion to St. Peter's Basilica.
The
Vatican's desire for diplomatic relations with Beijing makes almost difficult
any remonstrance over Chinese treatment of Catholics, though such is being
attempted, as when the Italian newsweekly L'Espresso published a two-page
article based on an interview with two Chinese priests. The article had not
identified the priests, out of fear for their safety, but authorities
interrogated the reporter's interpreter to learn their names. The priests have
since been arrested.
In the interview one of the priests spoke of a previous
detention, during which attempts were made by Chinese authorities "to evaluate
whether I had become patriotic." China is officially and aggressively atheist,
and such Christianity as is vestigially permitted is doctrinally emasculated.
(Christ did not rise from the dead; his mother was not a virgin.) Worship is
allowed, according to one Associated Press dispatch, "only in
government-controlled churches, which recognize the pope as a spiritual leader
but appoint their own priests and bishops. Catholic Chinese who meet outside
sanctioned churches are frequently harassed, fined, and sometimes sent to labor
camps."
The government's Catholic Church claims 34 million believers. The
Cardinal Kung Foundation, a U.S.-based religious monitoring group, says the
unofficial church of Chinese loyal to Rome has 12 million followers.
How
ought western diplomats to have treated Nazi officials in pre-war Germany? There
is enduring speculation on that subject, but none, we'd guess, that argues that
simply to ignore religious persecution is one acceptable way to confront it.
ALBUQUERQUE, N.M.
Gov. Bill Richardson is coming clean on his draft record _
the baseball draft, that is, admitting that his claim to have been a pick of the
Kansas City A's in 1966 was untrue.
http://www.breitbart.com/news/2005/11/24/D8E325882.htmlAfter reading this article, it pretty takes an arrow out of the quiver of the GOP attack machine. He has been a quiet name mentioned and would be at least an idela VP canidate. Don't forget he has been getting tougher on immigration, another hot issue.
I have been in the bar business since 92, and I've met plenty of interesting characters along the way. Any bartender worth thier weight in Rose's Lime juice will tell you that fact. But the lovely couple you see in the picture are just outsanding. Every Friday or Saturday night they are in the annex dancing and flirting with other couples.
They're not married, just two people who found each other as life moved on. She has her red wine and artsy outfits, she painted a picture for my first born, and he has a cigar and his suspenders. Every once and while he wears one of those rastafari hats with the fake dreds.
The smiles you see are as genuine as are they.
Well, Sen. Bayh finally sold his soul. First it was his attacks on Chief Justice Roberts, what a great ring to it; now his daring and risque laced speech in New Hampshire:
"I'd like to begin this evening by sharing some good news with all of you," Bayh
said, revving up the hard-core, sellout crowd. "In just about three years, the
Bush era will be over. Done. Finished."
Dare to take a risk, Senator. Technically yes, and hopefully a new Republican will take our country to a new and further the improved level we are on. I care little for the remarks of American-bashing euros, jealous, or the fearful left, hateful at best.
Bayh criticized the Bush administration for "needless division, misplaced
priorities and ineptitude"
And senator bayh shows the class from which our future leader should show.-- somewhat stronger language than he's been using lately, even in all-Democratic settings.
"President Bush sought our nation's highest office pledging to be a uniter, not
a divider, and has proceeded to divide this country more profoundly than any
time since the Vietnam War," Bayh said, eliciting long applause.
Only because a very bitter democratic party has yet to admit it dropped the ball in 2000 & 04. Before you give the conspiracy laced rhetoric of Ohio and Florida, don't, it just didn't happen.
The point I am getting at is once again the leadership of the democratic party is showing no real leadership because there is no message no signs of solution no signs of making things better.
Look at his themes: from DLC(Democratic Leadership Council)
unity - not when you condemn the man who won a majority of the last vote. You push away the right leaning middle. The uncalled for name calling and disrespect shown by the Democratic leadership reflects on the party.
opportunity - look at the complete success of his 21st Century Scholarship, only 25% actually graduate from college.
real security - try harder, please. What is your defintion, sell missle technology to the Chinese like President Clinton.
accountability - for a party that yet to accept its failures of the past, there is no sign of any real change.
My point is, he is tragically unspectacular. He is a cookie cutter canidate.
http://http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20051030/NEWS01/510300517
October 27th, 2005 - WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist
today made the following statement:
“Harriet Miers has asked the President
to withdraw her nomination to the Supreme Court. I respect her decision and
appreciate her service to our country.
“I look forward with anticipation to
the President naming the next nominee quickly.
“We remain ready to fulfill
our duty to provide advice and consent on judicial nominees. And the Supreme
Court still awaits its next justice--a highly qualified nominee who is committed
to upholding the Constitution and who believes in the limited role of a judge to
interpret the law and not legislate from the bench."
Reid on Miers Withdrawalthanks to their websites:
Thursday, October 27, 2005
Washington, D.C. –
Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid released the following statement on Harriet
Miers’ withdrawal of her nomination to the United States Supreme Court.
“The
radical right wing of the Republican Party killed the Harriet Miers nomination.
Apparently, Ms. Miers did not satisfy those who want to pack the Supreme Court
with rigid ideologues.
“I had recommended that the President consider
nominating Ms. Miers because I was impressed with her record of achievement as
the managing partner of a major Texas law firm and the first woman president of
the Texas Bar Association. In those roles she was a strong supporter of law firm
diversity policies and a leader in promoting legal services for the poor. But
these credentials are not good enough for the right wing: they want a nominee
with a proven record of supporting their skewed goals.
“In choosing a
replacement for Ms. Miers, President Bush should not reward the bad behavior of
his right wing base. He should reject the demands of a few extremists and choose
a justice who will protect the constitutional rights of all Americans.”